Remaking Equality: Community Governance and the Politics of Exclusion in Bogota's Public Spaces
In: International journal of urban and regional research: IJURR, Band 38, Heft 4, S. 1458-1475
ISSN: 0309-1317
5 Ergebnisse
Sortierung:
In: International journal of urban and regional research: IJURR, Band 38, Heft 4, S. 1458-1475
ISSN: 0309-1317
In: International journal of urban and regional research, Band 38, Heft 4, S. 1458-1475
ISSN: 1468-2427
In: Science & society: a journal of Marxist thought and analysis, Band 78, Heft 3, S. 404-406
ISSN: 0036-8237
In: International journal of urban and regional research, Band 38, Heft 4, S. 1458-1475
ISSN: 1468-2427
AbstractBogota's public space policy is often credited with promoting inclusionary principles. In this article, I explore critically the content of Bogota's articulation of equality in public space policy. In so doing, I present a critical view of the work Bogota's insistence on equality does to mediate class relations in the city, relying on deeply held conceptions of both social extremes. This results in the construction of a version of social harmony in public space that at once depoliticizes the claims to public space of subjects such as street vendors and the homeless and claims a new role for the middle class in the city. The analysis focuses on two examples of community governance schemes, documenting the logics and methods used by communities to implement official visions of equality and justify the exclusion of street vendors and homeless people from the area. By looking at the articulation of these exclusions in local class politics through seemingly inclusionary rhetoric, the article accounts for 'post‐revanchist' turns in contemporary urban policy, while anchoring its production in local processes of community governance.
In: Development and change, Band 40, Heft 3, S. 509-529
ISSN: 1467-7660
ABSTRACTThe modern project of rural development has been seen as one of increasing incorporation, control and rationalization of territory by the state. Evidence from the formulation of the Colombian land reform policy of 1961 gives more nuance to this general conceptualization. Those places where the state intervened through large‐scale resettlement programmes conceived within the framework of Cold War development are the same places where war and the drug economy — the most serious threats to the state itself — took root and grew. This article examines this contradiction. It interrogates the idea of modern development as a project that necessarily brings subjects and territories into the realm of state control. It also attempts to provide a counterweight to arguments about the territorialization of the war in Colombia being the outcome of state inaction and lack of development.